I've posted an article on Forbes taking a general look at the role of organic-approved classes of pesticides in California. The take-home points are that pesticide actives that are approved for use in organic made up 55% of the total crop use in 2013 and that those are used by both organic and conventional growers. I also take a look at the relative toxicity (simple acute ingestion toxicity) and there is a similar range for the organic and synthetic options. None of this is surprising because what determines whether a pesticide can be "organic" is whether it is "natural", and that is not a safety-based criterion. The safe use of all pesticides is the responsibility of the EPA and similar regulators around the world.
In this post I'd like to delve in more detail into what these widely used organic pesticides are and why they are used by all sorts of growers.
Major Categories of Organic-Approved Pesticides
In the first graph in this post I've divided the organic-approved materials into Mineral-based, Oil-Based, Natural Products and Live Biologicals. I'll talk about each category below.
Mineral-Based Pesticides
The mineral-based pesticides that are approved for organic include sulfur, lime-sulfur, and various forms of copper. Together these materials comprise 34% of the pounds used but only 12% of the area treated. That is because these are relatively high use-rate materials (~2 to 25 pounds/acre).
Sulfur has been used as a pesticide
since ancient times. While it is essentially non-toxic by ingestion, as someone
who has worked long hours in treated vineyards, I can tell you that it is quite
irritating to the eyes and skin. Sulfur controls powdery mildew fungi and
suppresses spider mites, but has to be reapplied every 7-10 days. It works by sublimation (direct transition from solid to gas) so it is ineffective if it is cold and can burn the crop if it is very hot. It is converted into reactive sulfur compounds in the humid boundary layer of a leaf or berry. Conventional
growers have alternatives that need only be applied at ounces/acre every 14-21
days, but continue to use some sulfur in their programs as a way to manage
resistance to the newer materials (see chart below for the trend in sulfur use on premium California
grapes).
Conventional grape growers today use about 1/3 as much sulfur because they have other options |
The next big mineral-based material is
lime sulfur. It is used for some dormant season sprays, so its
“moderately toxic” status (EPA Class II) is not an issue for crop residues.
The remaining organic mineral pesticides are the copper-based fungicides
which were discovered in the late 1800s and actually saved the European grape industry when a downy mildew
pathogen was introduced from the New World. Some of the copper products are
Class II in terms of oral toxicity, can be persistent, and are toxic to aquatic
invertebrates, but with appropriate care for where they are used, they are considered safe . Again, conventional
growers have lower rate, longer interval, more effective options, but use some
copper for resistance management. Coppers are also one of the few options for
the control of certain bacterial diseases and for algae control
in rice fields.
Petroleum Oil-based Products
An interesting organic-approved
category is a collection of oils derived from petroleum (mineral oil,
paraffinic oils, petroleum distillates…). These too are relatively old products
used at high rates, but they are effective on mites, aphids, whiteflies, scale
insects and also powdery mildews. These are also EPA Category IV – “essentially
non-toxic” to mammals by ingestion. Again, they are also used by conventional growers along with other more modern options.
JMS Stylet Oil is a major organic brand in this category |
Natural Products
Spinosyn-A - some seriously fancy chemistry (image via Klever) |
About 2% of the acre-treatments on
California crops were with various “natural products” which are chemicals that
are made by plants or from fermentations of various microbes (thus qualifying
them for organic). Nature is indeed a remarkable chemist, but that is not a
guarantee of safety. Some of the most toxic chemicals known are from nature.
The safe use of these materials is based on the same, elaborate risk assessment
that agencies like the EPA conducts for all pesticides. The most widely used
natural product is the plant hormone gibberellin (540,000 acre treatments).
The next biggest product (309,000 acres) is Spinosad
which was introduced by Dow Agrosciences. It comes from fermentation of an
actinomycete.
It’s a remarkably complex chemical, but very low in mammalian toxicity
(Category IV) and quite effective against all sorts of caterpillars and hard to
control insects like leaf miners. Unlike the mineral or oil-based pesticides,
it can move inside of the treated plant to protect newly emerging leaves. Lately it has become available to
homeowners as “Captain Jack’s Dead Bug Brew” which is a sort of
silly name, but definitely something I use in my garden.
The number 6 natural product (22,500
acres treated) is a relatively recently developed, plant-based natural product
that comes from a plant called Epazote or American Wormseed. The small, California company that commercialized it
was purchased by Bayer Chemical Company. They
have since introduced a product in Europe which is made of a mixture of the same four terpene
chemicals that occur in the plant extract.
That sort of product often generates much debate in the organic community about
whether it is still natural, but the chemicals are the same. In any case this
product is effective against various insects including thrips which are
difficult to control. That is why it will be increasingly used by both organic
and conventional growers.
Thrips cause these feeding scars you often see on snap peas or snow peas |
The smallest category of
organic-approved products are the biological control agents. The most used and
famous of these are various strains of the bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis, or
“Bt.” These bacteria make a protein that is selectively toxic only in the guts
of certain insects (e.g some work only on caterpillars, some only on beetles
and some only on mosquitoes). Together, 10 Bt-based products were applied to
320,000 acres. Some crops have been genetically engineered to express these
same Bt proteins, but those would not qualify for organic. Sweet corn has been
modified this way, but the sweet corn growers have been asked by their retail
store customers not to use the "GMO" varieties. Instead they must make at
least six more sprays a season than they would need to if they could use a Bt variety. That is a shame.
The "natural" pesticides that are approved for organic also have an important role in conventional agriculture. They are not qualitatively less toxic than synthetics, but then virtually all the pesticides used today are only moderately toxic at most and most commonly non-toxic in the classic sense. These and the modern synthetic pesticides play an important role in the efficient use of the land, water, fuel and labor that it takes to produce food.
You are welcome to comment here and/or to email me at savage.sd@gmail.com
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please send comments if you wish. Sorry about the word verification, but I'm getting tons of spam comments