Hawaii currently plays an important role in the global food
supply – one far more important than that of its historical sugarcane and
pineapple industries. When the
economic viability of plantation agriculture declined in the 1990s, a number of
international seed companies began to use some of that land as a “winter
nursery” site. The mild climate
allows multiple generations/year of crops like corn/maize. This helps to accelerate the breeding,
testing and early seed increase of that critically important feed/food/fuel
crop.
Globally over 850 million metric tons of maize is produced
each year (2010 data, FAOStats). Many regions of the world are net
importers of maize (82 million metric tons total, Asia 49, Africa 12, Middle
East 11, W. Europe 5.9, Caribbean 2.2, Central America 2.1). This is a crop that matters.
Because the global maize crop has included transgenic
hybrids for many years, much of the corn being grown in the nurseries is “GMO.”
Anti-GMO activists on Hawaii with
support from elsewhere are trying to restrict or remove these nursery
operations.
The County of Kauai is
considering a bill (#2491) which, if passed, would make it not only impractical
to continue the critical winter nursery work on “the garden isle,” but also
virtually any kind of agriculture (including organic).
Karl Haro von Mogel has posted
a good
critique of the bill on Biofortified.
A volunteer from Kauai who is helping the local agricultural
community organize a defense for the nursery industry and other types of
farming contacted me. She invited
several of us who blog and speak about agricultural issues to come to Kauai. I was asked if I could come and help
diffuse some of the fear that has been generated by a distorted view of
pesticide use in Kauai agriculture presented by the authors and supporters of
bill #2491. The Hawaii Department
of Agriculture keeps records of all the sales of “Restricted-Use Pesticides”
and those are available on request. “Restricted-Use Pesticide” is a term that
can easily be made to sound scary – particularly if those talking about it
never bother to look into what specific chemicals are involved and what
“restricted-use” means for each of them.
I asked for the same data set.
I’ve taken several days of time to gather information and
statistics from a variety of completely public sources that can put this
particular pattern of pesticide use into perspective. I’ll put up a detailed analysis later, but here are the hard
data-based messages I hope to communicate in various forums in Hawaii next
week:
·
The pesticides in question here are not the sort
of toxic chemicals most people imagine.
98% of what is applied is less toxic gram-for-gram than the caffeine in
your morning cup of coffee
·
These pesticides are not unusual – they are the
same ones commonly used on millions of acres of corn in the US Midwest and the
rates applied on Kauai are in the moderate to low range for corn
·
Quantities expressed in tons sound alarmingly
large, but when one factors in the total area involved we are talking about
0.000043 pounds/square foot per year
·
As more evidence that these are not unusual
chemicals, in 2011, 2.8 million pounds of these same pesticides were used on
164 different crops/settings in California in 51 counties
·
The main reason that these products are on the
“Restricted-use” list is to insure that the users have the training necessary
to take the necessary precautions so that they don’t move into bodies of water
where they could be toxic to fish or other things. With such care in application, there should be no
environmental issues with the use
Some Historical Context
It has been 51 years since the
publication of “Silent Spring.” The Environmental Movement that book helped to launch
has achieved tremendous gains. It
has been 44 years since the EPA was established and it has become more and more
sophisticated in its regulatory oversight designed to make pesticide use a low
risk activity. Billions of dollars
have been spent in the discovery, testing and commercialization of newer,
better pesticide options. When it
comes to crop biotechnology, this is the first form of crop improvement ever to
be regulated at all and by no less than three federal agencies (USDA, EPA,
FDA). Our health and the
environment are already being well protected through national and state regulation. There is no justification for an
entirely new, county-level regulatory process.
My Anticipated Reception
Because I will be defending the use
of pesticides and biotechnology, I fully anticipate being accused of being a
“shill.” I’m rather used to that label
after several years of blogging about such topics. Yes, I am someone who gets paid to consult for ag technology
companies, but the time I spend writing in defense of agriculture is actually counter-productive
for my income. I guess I must be a
pro-bono shill. This next week, and preparation for it,
will cost me consulting income.
I’m going to miss a week out of the special month of my grand daughter’s
summer visit. I’m also under no
delusion that I can convince many of those who will see me as part of some
grand conspiracy. My hope is to
present some solid, data-based perspective for people whose minds are still
open.
My Motivations
I’m going to Hawaii because I’m
sympathetic to the people who work in agriculture there, and I don’t want to
see those good jobs lost to the Kauai economy. But the main reason I’m willing
to go is that I think the winter nursery activity in Hawaii matters for the
future of the global food supply.
Technology as such, including biotechnology, is not what will
feed the world. Only farmers can
do that. But to do that, farmers
need to integrate a full “toolbox” of wise agronomic practices, elite genetics,
useful traits, crop protection chemicals, sophisticated equipment, and good
information in order to do their crucial job. Through the agency of such farmers, something like the
12,000 maize winter nursery acres on Kauai can enhance production efficiency
and/or reduce risk on hundreds of millions of acres of that crop around the
world. It would be a tragedy to
let unfounded and unevaluated fears compromise that contribution.
You are welcome to comment here and/or to email me at savage.sd@gmail.com. If anyone wants help with access to the information about pesticides and their use data I'm happy to show you how to find it. I tweet a bit @grapedoc